Sorry Darwin.
There is no model in science for increasing information through natural selection. Darwin assumed there was.
Modern science proves natural selection loses information and results in degradation. Subtraction cannot result in addition.
You just can’t get 3.2 billion bits of genetic information code in every strand of human DNA that way.
But then if we see a red octagon shaped sign with STOP written on it, we would never assume it got there by random time plus matter plus chance. We would know an intelligent being put that information there.
We have God’s signature in our cells. We know it as DNA. Information with order. Words with meaning.
That is intelligence.
Of Jesus Christ, John’s Gospel says,
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”
“He was in the beginning with God.”
“All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made.” (John 1:1-3, NKJV, The Bible)
January 4, 2016
Christ Centered Teaching
Christ Centered Teaching 
7 responses to “DNA Science is Unraveling Darwin’s Theory of Evolution”
thematrixq
February 12th, 2016 at 19:23
Do you agree with Dr Collins?
Christ Centered Teaching
February 13th, 2016 at 09:54
I agree with Collins that God is the only probable explanation for 3.2 billion bits of information in every strand of DNA.
But I do not agree with Collins regarding evolution.
But Collins believes evolution may be part of God’s creation process.
I do not.
I do agree with Collins regarding the bigger question regarding proof that God exists. He tells what is wrong with the logic of the new athiest position that we see no proof that God exists. (From a PEW Research interview )
Collins uses a circle as an analogy, I use a box as an analogy. Essentially the same.
Collins:
“I think strong atheism, of the kind that says, “I know there is no God,” suffers from two major logical flaws. And the awareness of those flaws might be reassuring to believers who are somehow afraid that these guys may actually have a point.”
“The first of those is the idea that anyone could use science at all as a conversation-stopper, as an argument-ender in terms of the question of God. If God has any meaning at all, God is at least in part outside of nature (unless you’re a pantheist). Science is limited in that its tools are only appropriate for the exploration of nature. Science can therefore certainly never discount the possibility of something outside of nature. To do so is a category error, basically using the wrong tools to ask the question.”
“Secondly, I think the logical error that atheists of the strong variety commit is what English writer G.K. Chesterton calls the most daring dogma of the universal negative. I often use a visual analogy to explain this. Suppose you were asked to draw a circle that contains all the information, all the knowledge that exists or ever will exist, inside or outside the universe – all knowledge. Well, that would be a pretty enormous circle. Now, suppose on that same scale, you were asked to draw what you know at the present time. Even the most assertive person will draw a rather tiny circle. Now, suppose that the knowledge that demonstrates that God exists is outside your little circle today. That seems pretty plausible, doesn’t it, considering the relative scale? How then – given that argument – would it be reasonable for any person to say, “I know there is no God”? That is clearly going outside of the evidence.” ~Francis Collins – Foremost Geneticist for the Human G-nome Project
Christ Centered Teaching
January 21st, 2016 at 04:41
Read Francis Collins “Signature in the Cell”.
Collins is the world authority on genetics.
Christ Centered Teaching
February 14th, 2016 at 11:53
Acctually, thats by Meyer. My mistake. Meyer quotes Collins in his book though. Collins book is “The Language of God “
Christ Centered Teaching
January 4th, 2016 at 07:18
The scientific evidence of DNA is eroding the erroneous theory of evolution.
Thank you Dr.Stebbins
God bless
Dr. Lloyd Stebbins
January 4th, 2016 at 04:24
The best most concise summary I’ve seen.
Dr. Lloyd Stebbins
January 4th, 2016 at 04:24
Reblogged this on Dr. Lloyd Stebbins and commented:
The best most concise summary I’ve seen.